An exploratory call for only nine days, a question scored a year before and refuses in the documents: the yellow of the determination that assigns the contract to the T41b
While the Pesaro custody is focused on the orders that ended up to cultural associations mediated by Massimiliano Santini, the former communicator-Factotum chosen by Matteo Ricci, there is another vein that flows under track: that of social cooperatives with alleged tailor-made calls.
From one case in particular, between the last phase of the Ricci era and the entrance of Andrea Biancani, bureaucratic gars seem to emerge that recall those who attracted the attention of the prosecutor led by Marco Mescolini. With a determination of June 27, 2024, the number 1633, the Municipality of Pesaro assigned to the social cooperative T41b, a historic Pesaro reality born in 1976 on the initiative of Don Gianfranco Gaudiano with the aim of offering work to fragile or disabilities, which today has about 140 employees and revenues for over 5 million euros, a biennial contract from 77,782 euros more for socio-employment intended for disabled people in charge of specialist services. At a first reading it seems a well -kept determination: there are references to the new contract code, references to regional resolutions and sector rules, indications on the budget chapters.
The expression of interest and the “mystery” of the dates
But just look more carefully to find that the shape and substance do not seem to travel more on the same track. The path starts with an exploratory public notice, published from 30 May to 8 June 2024. A window of only nine days to collect events of interest by social workers registered in the Mepa, the electronic market of the Public Administration. A flash ban, scrolling like a race train, where only the T41b was on the wagon. The only subject that has been forward. “Cooperative with divinatory capacity”, he calls it Pia Perricci, lawyer, former candidate for mayor in the last round of administrative with the civic come further. Because in that same determines there is a detail that makes everything very confused: the expression of interest of the T41b, is written in the administrative document, was registered on May 19, 2023. A year earlier. “It is not said that the municipality is not a provident”, ironically comments the lawyer Perricci.
Direct custody and doubts about the logic of the announcement
Certainly the body certified that there was “one” expression of interest. That is, that of the T41b. The consequence is that the administration was able to proceed with direct assignment, justifying it with the new contract code. But here we enter a logical short circuit: how do you say that the question has come “in the terms”, if everything happened through Mepa and if the proposal from the T41b brings the date of May 2023, that is, one year after the warning window of 30 May 2024?
Two scenarios. The first: a typo on the year. But also in this case the application, of May 19, would be submitted ten days before the notice, open on May 30th. And, in any case, there is a protocol number (63721) that should certify the certain date of the submission of the application. The second: the Coop sent the question and the Municipality built the announcement.
In both cases the result does not change: the only offer was that of the T41b. The auction base was set at 79,532.17 euros. The T41b offered 77,782.46 euros: a discount of just over 2%. Almost symbolic. For two years round service: from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2026.
Refuses, incorrect codes and dancer standards
Scrolling through it, however, other inconsistencies jump to the eyes. Alongside the address of the Municipality, at the foot of the page, the postcode code is sometimes reported with the “61100” and sometimes with the “61121”. As well as the CPV code (Common you will procure Vocabulary), the European classification of public purchase contracts, seems to have been reported several times in determining in an incorrect way: “8530000-8”. Eight overall digits. In theory, according to the regulations, the first eight digits would identify the type of supply (work or service), the last figure, the one after the dash, on the other hand, is a symbol of control, for a total of nine digits. A particular detail, because it may have made the announcement difficult to trace on official platforms (provided that the code that appears incomplete in resolution is finished there too).
And it is not over: the regulatory reference oscillates in the same resolution between “Legislative Decree 36/2023” and an unlikely “legislative decree 36/2024”. Errors that seem to reveal a certain haste in the construction of the deed. In a context, that of public custody, in which the refuses can have a weight.
The words of the lawyer Perricci
“It is true that in today’s society everything runs much faster also thanks to the internet”, comments the lawyer Perricci, “but even predicting a year earlier the issue of a determination exceeds the expectations of Mago Merlino. Honestly, I hope it is the result of an error of typing, but I do not understand why all these errors occur within the municipality of Pesaro ». Refusi or not, “a data is certain”, concludes Perricci, “if you are the owners of a cooperative, you can come to invest in Pesaro, apparently the area is profitable”.
