Second equal in a row for Juventus, stopped by Atalanta after the half false step with Verona. For the Croatian technician there are reasons for reflection because the start of the season, positive for the results, has been contradictory for services
Some cracks had already seen against Inter and Borussia Dortmund, hidden by the comebacks of Juventus model “Until the end”. Then the setback in Verona and a week spent discussing the arbitration blunders by losing sight of, perhaps, that net of the errors of the Rapuano-Aurelian couple, on the field Tudor’s team had not been up to par. In short, the signs were there and It must not be surprised that with Atalanta the script has repeated itself.
Another half a false step that came in the strangest way possible, with a great departure without luck and without precision and, then, with a progressive loss of tactical references. It was not enough to win the fresh talent of Yildiz and Adzic, lined up together from the beginning to trigger open. And it was not enough even to play the other offensive cards available on the bench. Indeed, the paradox is that the best Juventus was seen at the beginning and the Atalanta that had suffered the black and white outlets, finding itself ahead almost by chance, she kept without major problems until the error that gave the same.
A situation to reflect on, that of Tudor, because it is explained only by listing the strengths and defects of a team that does not yet have a precise identity. So far he had saved himself by squeezing the blows of his talents to the maximum and relying on the character of those who do not want to lose; It could not go on to the bitter end and, in fact, the positive strip interrupted. The feeling is that Juventus is waterproof if he plays restart, tightening to his defensive leader Bremer, while he becomes drilling and fragile when he unfolds the wings. Except that it is built to get the best of the attack, for quantity and quality, and it is impossible to imagine that it sacrifices its talent to resulting pragmatism.
Among the folds of the Juventus moment there are two other annotations on which Tudor will do well to reflect. The first is a certain confusion and predictability when the team attacks, often limiting itself to giving the ball to Yildiz or the fantasy of the outside on duty, waiting for numerical superiority to be created and an opportunity to hurt. And then there is Jonathan David Which is no coincidence, but put together the third bench in a row in the championship. First Vlahovic, now Opennda: Tudor seems to prefer more for the moment in the center of the attack.
