Politics

Migrant landings, the clash between NGOs and government on the assigned ports

The organizations that go to fish migrants in the midst of the Mediterranean are careful of the government decrees and dock where they want. But so you don’t go anywhere. Indeed, only a great chaos is made that does not allow correct management of arrivals in our country. Nor a real welcome

It is not a block of an NGO Naval Block NGO, the Mediterranean, in a broad sense. It would be only to respect the directives imposed by the Ministry of the Interior which legitimately indicates the port to which it directs to the NGOsRSI. No, the NGOs do not intend to respect this indication, among other things binding, given by the minister planted. They want to decide on which port to head and dock.

The case concerns The ship of the NGO Saving Humans that should have attracted to Genoa, but attracted to Trapani “It is inhuman and unacceptable that the Ministry of the Interior wants to force these ten people to support three days of navigation, exposing them to useless further suffering,” said Beppe Caccia, head of mission aboard the ship.

Frankly It seems to us an unsustainable thesisas if there was a group of sadistic ones, led by an equally sadistic minister, planted, who, in spite of every humanitarian sentiment, decides to want to impose sufferings to the 10 immigrants aboard the ship. The hypothesis that the Ministry, in indicating this destination, Genoa, has done so, is not even taken because, evidently, he believes that that destination could have ensured a reception of the most adequate immigrants themselves of the port of Trapani.

In doing so, we will get to the total state of anarchy in the management of migrants. It has been said many times that the landing in uncertain port contexts would not have ensured an adequate welcome as already overflowing with migrants. See for everyone the case of Lampedusa. It has been said as many times that if welcome there must be it must have the minimum requirements of possible and not generic reception. Among these requirements there is obviously that relating to the number of people to be accepted.

Given the bankruptcy of European politics that should have redistributed migrants in order to ensure that they did not only land in Italyor even by doing it, they then found destinations in the different European countries, at least it will be possible to allow those who must manage this Italian emergencies, without any European help, apart from the proclamations as easy as useless, by the important representatives of the European Union, well, at least you can defend the fact that the government decides where to get these NGO boats.

Breast We have the courage to clearly say that the rights of NGOs and migrants transport are superior to the laws and regulations of the Italian state. And we also have the courage to say that the leaders of these ships can decide, in the name and on behalf of their transported, what to do without interference of the law and the laws, as well as Italian regulations.
This has not yet been said, but this is the reality that emerges from the disobedience of this NGO to what cannot be disobeyed, that is, a command from the ministry responsible for these policies.

The Ocean Viking, humanitarian ship of the NGO SOS Méditerranée, has rescued 47 people, including 9 unaccompanied minors, aboard an inflatable boat in difficulty in international waters north of Libya. In this case, the Italian Ministry of the Interior has awarded the Marina di Carrara landing port, over 1,300 kilometers from the point of rescue, a route involving about three and a half days of navigation. Also in this case, it was claimed that that ship cannot get too far from the Mediterranean because there is a need for help and help to the migrants of the boats and the boats managed by criminal associations.

It would be interesting to see what would happen if these boats headed towards Spain or France. In Spain they shoot on the boats that approach. What France does we know well from what he made rejecting migrants to the Ventimiglia borderbringing them to Boschetti close there and leading them, only to hear from Macron and his companions to make the injury on the need for a welcoming Europe, open to peoples, respectful of human dignity.

Us We do not think that the road followed by France and Spain can constitute an example for us, indeed it is to deplore. But on the other hand it cannot be tolerated a continuous and badly justified disobedience towards the attempts by Italy of organize the migratory phenomenon that affects us as reasonable as possible more than any other European country.

Will it be legitimate for a government to decide at least the port of arrival? Will it be necessary for an executive to try to govern the migratory phenomenon? Among other things, the Italian government has reopened the migratory flows allowing the arrival of hundreds of thousands of people in the coming years, in a regular basis.

So you don’t go anywhere. Only a great chaos is done which does not allow the development and the fulfillment of policies dictated by an overall vision of the country’s ports.