The Review Court, as part of the investigation into Milanese urban planning, also cancels the precautionary measure of Manfredi Catella, patron of Coima. Overturned all the precautionary measures imposed by the investigating judge
Also for Manfredi Catellathe real estate of Coima at the center of the investigations within the investigation into the Milanese urban planning, The Milan Review Court ordered the revocation of house arrest. The judge thus accepted the request for the defense of the founder and CEO of the Coima real estate group, who had been placed under house arrest together with five other suspects in the operation of the Milan prosecutor’s office.
Catella was the last of the arrested on which the review was to express itself, after having already ordered the release of the former municipal councilor for Urban Planning Giancarlo Tancredi and of Giuseppe Marinonipresident of the Commission’s landscape commission.
As for the other suspects, the Review Court had already canceled the precautionary measures in recent weeks also for Alessandro Scandurraarchitect and member of the landscape commission, which had ended up under house arrest, as well as for Andrea Bezziccherimanufacturer and patron of Bluestonethe only one of the suspects to end briefly in prison.
With the liberation of Catella, all six arrested on July 31 have now returned to freedommarking a complete reversal of the judge’s decisions for preliminary investigations.
The public ministries of the investigation contest the crimes of corruption and falseassuming that the entrepreneur had established privileged relationships with officials and municipal administrators to encourage the real estate projects of his company. In a memory filed on August 20, the prosecutors had repeated the precautionary requests, underlining what they defined “master ways”Of catella within the municipality.
The investigation of the Milanese judiciary has reconstructed an alleged mechanism through which some large real estate developers would have conditioned the urban choices of the cityobtaining advantages for their projects through privileged relationships with assessors and officials.
For the Prosecutor, in fact, as highlighted in the supplementary memory provided on 14 July, Catella had a “main way, to the limit of the inverted, and outside the law, to interact with the Public Administrationusing it as through the commissioner Tancrediof the general manager Malangone and of the Mayor Roomwhich deals with his unfortunate and not very efficient employees, to condition the opinions of the landscape commission to his advantage, the contents of the calls in which the Municipality must auction the properties of its heritage “.
