Found a male genetic profile unknown in the oral buffer never analyzed before: it does not belong to stasis nor in semium. The hypothesis of several people on the scene is strengthened
A twist that reopens cracks never closed. Eighteen years after the crime of Chiara Poggi, the Garlasco case returns to shake public opinion. In a fragment that remained unheeded so far – the victim’s oral buffer of the victim’s body – a “unknown” male genetic profile has been isolated. The material, of type Y, was identified by the experts appointed by the Court of Pavia during the evidentiary accident. It does not belong to the ex -boyfriend Alberto Stasi, definitively sentenced, nor to Andrea Semplio, investigated in the new investigative phases.
The DNA never sought before: an unknown male profile in Chiara’s mouth
The finding, so far remained out of genetic analyzes, has been taken in 2007 by the coroner Marco Ballardini, but never examined. It has remained archived for years, until the evidentiary accident ordered by the new investigation. There, on the gauze used for the oral withdrawal, the genetic track now entrusted to the geneticist Denise Albani for amplification emerged. It would be a direct contact with the victim in the phases of the crime.
More people on the crime scene?
The new findings strengthen an increasingly concrete hypothesis for investigators: Chiara Poggi would not have been attacked by a single person. In addition to the genetic profile found in the mouth, other elements emerged during the evidentiary accident support the presence of multiple individuals. On the young man’s nails have been detected partially attributable to Andrea Semplio, but also a second male profile still unknown.
The imprint on the door and the shoe “in dots”
Further clues come from other finds: a male DNA has not been attributable to Stasi nor a semdio was isolated on the acetate of the four fingers found on the kitchen door. However, this is not a blood trace, a detail that suggests a different but potentially crucial contact. Instead, the mystery about the “pallini” scarp imprint is clarified on the bathroom mat: that step was attributed to the victim’s father or brother.
An investigation that rewrites the past
The investigation conducted by the prosecutor Fabio Napoleone and by the Pool of Pavia opens an unpublished perspective: if the new elements are confirmed, the Garlasco case could not only reopen judicial scenarios, but also rewrite the narration of one of the most followed Cold Houses in Italy. Who was really on the crime scene that August 13, 2007? And above all: why, after so many years, that DNA remained silent?
