Speaking in the context of the defamation trial in which Andrea Sempio’s former lawyer is accused are Fabio and Enrico Giarda
In the apparently infinite complexity of knots to be untied to solve the Garlasco crime, there is a legal trend which sees as protagonists the former lawyers of Alberto Stasi And Andrea Sempio.
The brothers Fabio and Enrico Giardaformer lawyers of the man who was defined as a “blond with icy eyes” and sentenced to 16 years in prison for the murder of Chiara Poggihave clarified some fundamental points about the defamation trial in which the accused is Massimo Lovatiformer lawyer of the person who is considered (in the investigative hypothesis of the Pavia prosecutor’s office) to be solely responsible for the Garlasco crime.
To begin with, in the trial there would be «no machinations against Andrea Sempio». The two brothers are trying to bring order to the process that led to the reopening of the file on the 38-year-old.
The clash between the Giarda and Lovati brothers
The crux of the matter are the statements (judged defamatory) that Lovati released to the public shortly after the case was exhumed on March 13, 2025.
«We learn the defamatory phrases from some journalists who call us asking for explanations. These are statements made in front of numerous newspapers and television stations by Lovati who is no stranger to these declarations: they are one of his strong points”, he underlines Fabio Giardaadding that he had «already reported it in 2017 when even then he spoke of a plot against Exampleor DNA manipulation.” Lovatiin that specific case, was referring to the trace of genetic material which proved to be a key element in the investigation into the new suspect in 2025.
According to the SKP investigation company, which was entrusted with the defense investigations, a scrupulous DNA search involved, in addition to Examplealso his friends, and «an unknown man who showed up at the family’s car dealership Stasis claiming to know who the murderer is.”
The doubts about Sempio’s archiving in 2017
Fabio Giarda he also appears rather dubious regarding the 2017 archiving of Example. The former lawyer of Alberto Stasi he expresses his bitterness for the insinuations addressed to him and his brother: «The defamation has had effects on our professional sphere, but also on the personal sphere. These accusations bring into play the figure of our father, who died in 2021.” “Bringing out the idea of machination, supporting the idea of our illicit activity”, he finally explains, “is something we couldn’t ignore and we are also here to restore our father’s image”.
The secondary strands of the Garlasco crime are also based on these dynamics, on these opposing opinions, on these processes that have little or nothing to do with the murder itself, but which demonstrate how delicate the case is, how time has corroded the internal and external patience of all the people involved. And how high time it is to put an end to (truly doing justice) an affair in which not even the living seem to find peace.
