Ukraine cannot get peace without the United States. JD Vance does not say it and not even Donald Trump. After the quarrel with Volodymyr Zelensky he explained it Keir Starmer directly to the Ukrainian president. Obviously he did not make the declaration in favor of cameras, but in private, as is used to keep diplomatic issues confidential.
The English premier spoke to Zelensky And with the 14 leaders gathered in London to discuss the situation that came to create after the tear to the White House. To anticipate the position of Stormer It was the Financial Timesnamely the London financial bible, listened to and followed throughout Europe. According to the British newspaper, the English premier would have ensured that both the Ukrainian president and the heads of government of the main European countries understood that peace cannot be done without America. “There is only one solution,” he seems to have said, “and he passes from the White House.”
Mind you, what he said Stormer It is nothing transcendental, but rather it is a simple, perhaps trivial, ascertainment, that in these days we, in our small way, have repeated several times. However, after the disastrous press conference in the oval study, someone had come the unhealthy idea that not peace but the war could be done alone, without the USA. From Macron to Scholzall European leaders not only have manifested solidarity a Zelenskybut they promised to continue supporting the country, pronouncing bombastic phrases. The echo of words ended up, however, a question immediately asked himself: yes, but how? That is: where we find the money and weapons to continue the conflict and impose on Putin A negotiation that does not look like a surrender? There are those who have done the accounts and it seems that they serve 300 billion, money that would be added to those already spent in the last three years. But does Europe have them? With the Chiari di Luna of the recession in Germany, with France to the gas barrel and the Great Britain that slides, obviously not. The only ones to have the money because they have a GDP traveling at swollen sails are the Americans. So, willingly or nolent, even if many politicians with the stench under their nose would gladly do without it, touched convincing Zelensky to return to Canossa. Indeed, to the White House. It may have been unpleasant, a bully may be judged, but Trump In the oval studio he said a bitter truth. Without the aid of the United States, Ukraine would have resisted two weeks. Of course, as the Polish Prime Minister says Tuskit is absurd that 500 million Europeans ask for help from 300 million Americans to be defended by 150 million Russians. But the problem is that among the 500 million citizens of the Union, it is difficult to find someone willing to die for Kiev. After 80 years of peace, Europe does not want war. He does not want to pay the costs, he does not intend to count the dead. This is the pure and simple reality that on the left persist not to see. All the rest, starting with the manifestations of solidarity towards Ukraine expressed at the highest leaders, are chatter. Indeed, hypocrisy that can be safely supported while you are comfortable in the living room.
Zelensky He lost the war. Point. If he does not want to lose peace also stops liability to those who are ready to arm him, but not starting for the front.
