The highest judicial body establishes the obvious: the legal definition of woman does not include transsexual people. Jk Rowling is also exulting.
Transgender women are not women. To establish it, in addition to biology, is the British Supreme Court, which has sanctioned how men who perform the transition to the female gender have no right to be recognized as women by law, nor to share the protections provided for women of women’s biological sex.
It is not at all a discounted sentence in today’s West, imbued with Wake culture and gender theories. The British Supreme Court has decided to accept the appeal of the feminist group “For Women Scotland“Against the Scottish government, where local authorities had promoted legislation aimed at guaranteeing the recognition of the definition of women also to transsexuals who had obtained the” certified gender recognition “(a certificate that allows you to change its name and sex on documents).
There judgment Of the greatest British judicial body is valid in the entire Great Britain, therefore also in Wales and England, and has already created a vespaio of controversy between gender activists, pro-transgender feminist activists and other feminist activists contrary to the equalization between biological and non-biological women (such as the aforementioned for Women Scotland). Yes, a great confusion, but such has now become Europe “Woke”.
The highly anticipated verdict arrived after two long hearings held in November last year, during which the parties had exposed their respective arguments. The sentence was signed by 5 judges, men and women, of the Supreme Court, to account was the supervisor judge, Lord Patrick Hodge.
“According to the unanimous decision of this Court, the terms women and sex of the 2010 Equality Act (the reference law on the equality in force on the island) refer to the biological woman and biological sex”. Lord Hodge, however, wanted to clarify that the sentence should not be interpreted as “the triumph” of one part against the other.
According to the Supreme Court, the British rules already ensure full protection of transgender people from all types of discrimination. There is therefore no need to extend the definition of woman to transsexual people and thus force the Equality Act.
Outside the classroom, some feminist activists of the aforementioned group “For Women Scotland” have however celebrated, intoning songs and slogans at the foot of the statue of Millicent Fawcett, a historical figure of the suffragette movement. Among those present there were also some protagonists of a certain importance, such as Joanna Cherryjurist and former Scottish deputy of Scottish National Party. Cherry, co -founder in 2018 of the For Women Scotland group, later dissociated himself from the independentist and progressive party to the government in Edinburgh precisely because of the differences on the theme “Transgender”.
And the famous writer of the novels of Harry Potter can also exult, JK Rowlingengaged in the battle against gender ideology for years and defense of the biological differences between man and woman. Alongside the Scottish government and the “Gender Recognition Certificate”, however, among others Amnesty International UK, as well as a plethora of LGBTQIA+associations.
Rowling immediately expressed its happiness for the historic decision through its X account: «There were three extraordinary and tenacious Scottish women, with an army behind him, to ensure that this case would reach the Supreme Court and, winning, they protected the rights of women and girls throughout the United Kingdom! I’m proud of you! ».
The first political reactions also arrived, with the Labor Party currently in the Government who affirmed how the sentence brought “clarity and trust”. While the conservative party, in the opposition, defined it A “clear victory of common sense”urging the government to modify the existing guidelines.
And in fact it was a “clear victory of common sense”, the regret, if anything, is that such a self -evident truth had to be reaffirmed by a supreme court.
