Politics

Agnelli, earthquake in the classroom: Margherita presents an unpublished will. Elkann: “Nothing changes”

Insiere in Turin: deposited will of 20/1/1998 attributed to the lawyer. For Margherita 25% of December was by Edoardo; Elkann: “No impact”

A twist shakes the dispute on the inheritance Agnelli. In the civil hearing in Turin, the lawyers of Margherita Agnelli have deposited a unpublished testament attributed to Gianni Agnellidated January 20, 1998. An act that, according to the actress, can affect the architecture of Powers in simple society Decemberthe safe from which the control of the family empire descends. The move reopens the dossier on testamentary will of the lawyer and the legitimate destination of the participations today in the hands of Elkannwhose lawyers, however, cool enthusiasm: “nothing changes”.

What the 1998 document would say

According to what emerged and reported in the classroom, the 1998 testament – holograph and product In photostatic copy – would predict a clear disposition: “To modify other previous provisions I leave my son Edoardo my participation in the simple company December equal to approaching at 25%”. In the text, the lawyer would also trust in the acceptance of the choice by the other already members.

December, the key of control

December It is the pin of the owner. In the current scheme, John Elkann holds the 60%while the rest 40% has left between Lap And Geneva Elkann. If the 1998 document was recognized valid and effective, it could question the origin and destination of that 25% sharereopening the questions about who should be the owner of it.

The positions in the field

For the lawyers of Margherita Agnelli (Dario Trevisan And Valeria Proli), the will shows that the subsequent header a John Elkann It would not reflect the last will of the lawyer: participation would have been destined for Edoardo and, in his absence, to his legitimate heirs (Margherita Agnelli e Marella Caracciolo). The defensive line of the Elkann: the alleged testament of 1998, produced only now and in copy, “does not affect in any way” nor on the Succession Agnelli nor on that Caraccioloand therefore does not alter the owner structure of December.

The previous mosaic: Testaments and “Letter of Monaco”

So far, the only well -known testament of the lawyer was composed of Three handwritten cardsopen in 2003 from the notary Morone in Turin: texts focused on real estate And testamentary executorswithout direct references to December. The picture also enters the “Letter from Monaco” of 1996in which the lawyer would indicate John Elkann as successor in the management of holding: document not comparable to a will and of a different flow from a patrimonial provision.

The civil trial and the criminal investigation

The filing of the new act is part of a wider dispute: Margherita pizza dispute the validity of the will of Marella Caracciolo and of theSascent agreement of 2004claiming to have been injured in their rights. In parallel there is a criminal strand: the Guardia di Finanza has acquired documents relating to presumed patrimonial concealment operations And tax fraud through trust and trustees. In the reconstructions that emerged, John Elkann would have paid around 175 million euros To remedy the disputes of theRevenue Agency. The October 27th The decision of the Gip on the request for storage presented by the defense Elkann.

What can happen now

There validity and theeffectiveness of the will of the 1998 will be subject to Technical and legal investigations: authenticity, eventual revocationcompatibility with the READ RIGHT Italian and any profiles cross -border. In the background, the verification of the fiscal residence Of Marella Agnelli At the time of death – not secondary passage for identifying the applicable legislation – and the mapping of Trust structures. If the document exceeds the vagli, the impact could be direct on the division of shares Of December; If it does not exceed them, a fee of dispute will remain in an already stratified process.