The Garlasco case reignites again, between the request for review of the trial for Alberto Stasi and the evidence against Andrea Sempio
The goal has always been the same for nineteen years: to understand what really happened that damned morning of August 13, 2007 in Garlasco.
There are currently two parallel paths on the table. The first leads Alberto Stasi, already definitively convicted, to review the trial. The second leads Andrea Sempio, currently the only suspect, to be sent to trial.
The new Poggi report
The spotlight is turned back on by an appraisal commissioned by the Poggi family’s lawyers. The consultant Fabio Falleti has re-examined the route that Stasi would have followed inside the housewondering if it was really possible to cross the corridor without stepping in blood.
The answer, according to the expert, is negative. The free spaces would in fact have been much smaller than in previous reconstructions. The open folding door, the handle and the numerous blood stains on the floor would have in fact left an extremely narrow passage. Passing without dirtying the soles of the shoes would have been highly unlikely for Falleti.
To make the painting even more delicate there is a detail that has remained suspended in time: a black elastic band that belonged to Chiara Poggi, found precisely in the point where, according to some hypotheses, it would have been necessary to rest the foot to avoid blood.
The evolution of the Garlasco investigation
Meanwhile, the Milan Prosecutor’s Office continues to examine the documentation relating to the possible review of the trial against Stasi and the most recent investigative developments concerning Sempio. A verification work that is intertwined with the new technologies available to investigators.
In this regard, on the investigative tools front, Matteo Adjimi, managing director of Argo spa, spoke, according to which today investigations into cases like that of Garlasco can also make use of Israeli software for cell phone inspection and artificial intelligence systems for document analysis. However, Adjimi maintains a certain skepticism about the possibility of sensational breakthroughs: “I believe everything possible has already been done from an investigative point of view”, he maintains, adding that the new elements “will only remain as such and will not become new evidence”.
