The judges recognize the “merchandise of function”: marinoni pivot of the mechanism, Tancredi with “high criminal attitude”, leaks the private ring of the system
For weeks there has been talk of a fragile accusatory system, of investigations to be rereaded in the light of precedents in which the review had reduced the accusations (think of the cases of Alessandro Scandurra And Andrea Bezziccheri). This time, however, the Court of Milan – The judges Paola Pendino (President), Francesca Ghezzi And Gianluca Tenchio – leaves no room for misunderstandings: the corrupt system that revolved around the landscape commission of Palazzo Marino, led by the architect Giuseppe Marinoni (the pivot to build “profitable” relationships) supported by the Councilor for Urban Planning Giancarlo Tancredi (“High criminal attitude”) and powered by the manager’s business Federico Pella of J+S (“the private ring of the system”), according to the judges it would be real, tried by chat, documents and concrete acts.
The three ordinances (that of Manfredi Catella) take a position and give reason to the Prosecutor: the judges of the review recognize a stable corrupt system, based on the “mercy of the function”, that is, on a continuous provision of the public role in exchange for economic and professional advantages, rather than on individual acts contrary to office duties. It is the key difference: it does not always need to identify the “dirty resolution” if the agreement is to use the office as a coin; A setting that also explains why the accusation line, this time, holds almost everywhere, unlike cases Scandurra And Bezziccheriwhere the review had filed and criticized. The heart is the landscape commission, an advisory body that would have been actually transformed into a lever of influence: Marinoni He enters and presides over the sessions despite being in conflict of interest, signing the non -existence modules of the conflict that the judges consider fakes (they quote, among others, 22 and 29 June 2023 and 19 October 2023), while in parallel he entertains relationships and negotiations with operators and designers who then bring cards before the commission itself. Around, the private circuit: Pella For the Court it would not be a simple designer but the J+S operating ring that dialogues, proposes, organizes, conscrile with Marinoni The “pgt shadow” – so they call it in chat – and packs, together, the strategy of nodes and metropolitan doors; Strategy that obtains the patronage of the Municipality (January 2023) and becomes credentials to the tables with investors and large groups (Unipol, Hines, Coima, Euromilano, Lendlease, Nhood, Carfin, ATM and RFI), even when the two large PPPs (public-private partnership) mentioned-Famagosta and Stephenson-will stop before arriving in the commission. It is here that according to the judges, “improper corruption” takes concrete form: not necessarily the envelope, but the patronage of the body used to reassure private individuals and orient volumes, the promise of rapid lanes and frame choices (Ers as a “public function” that justifies the operation, implementation plans “Smatriate” via PPP), the minute update between the commission and the president of the commission on how to tire, density and times, even on how to present the same moves to the public debate during the revision of the PGT.
On the evidentiary level, the judges list key cases: via Palizzi (19 -storey building) with the annotations found on the PC of Marinoni «Palizzi Pisani 25,000» and then “30,000 + 50,000”, which the Prosecutor reads as a price of corruption; The defense disputes and produces an alternative invoice, but for the review those sums remain serious clues in the plot of exchange relationships; Conversely, via Pisani and via Gardella enter as examples of malcostume (confidential relationships, improper information) rather than as a test full of dates; The “Goccia-Bovisa” (Polytechnic campus) is in the framework of reports and assignments to the J+S, without a punctual corruptive status in the review, but consistent with the pattern; Finally, Famagosta and Stephenson would show the “bait” function of the patronage and the expense of the municipal brand in private interviews. The judges describe the mechanism that would have been built by Giancarlo Tancredi As a sophisticated, based on advanced technical and administrative skills and on a deep knowledge of the urban planning legislation used in a distorted way. The former councilor has a heritage of knowledge on the functioning of the public machine that would have been folded to its own interests and, although uncensored, for the magistrates it would reveal a concrete and current high criminal attitude, marked by the organization of activities, by the systematic abuse of function and by the “return” benefits in terms of visibility and political influence. He would have followed “perverse logic of illegality” with “unscrupulousness”, carrying out a “criminal” activity and showing himself “very active” in the tear of favors to increase his and others’ influences. The custom of regular meetings with the co -owned before the commission’s sessions would confirm a stable and intentional coordination.
Marinoni It would be the pivot of the system: president-commissioner and consultant together, capable of exploiting the charge for “profitable” relationships, up to the chats in which he admits “we are implementing a shadow pgt … and with high fees”. The judges exclude evidentiary pollution but reiterate the danger of reiteration, so much so that they impose interdictive measures to cut operational bonds. The role of the mayor is also central Giuseppe Salawhich in December 2024 reconfirmation Marinoni and appoint Giovanni Oggioniand that together with the general manager Christian Malangone – reads the cards – he would have shared the group’s strategies; in the negotiations on the Meazza, Marinoni And Pella They would have moved the moves on the mayor’s expected decisions. This time the judges give reason to the Prosecutor, marking the distance from Scandurra And Bezziccheri and restoring the image of a “Milan model” that would bend rules and procedures to the interests of a restricted circle.
